Victor

Walks. Walking past trees and other natural objects helps the mind process thoughts and emotions, from what I heard. Maybe even not just natural objects.

It engages everything, I suppose. The body and the mind.

Supposedly helps you get over stuff.

I can’t vouch for it myself, but worth giving it a go if it does work. Couldn’t hurt. Good luck, friend!

🤨

Ah no worries. I found it a little bit difficult to believe that the decision wouldn’t be questioned by the company if it didn’t align with its overall goals. That would be weird.

Exactly my point.

You could’ve tried it yourself in the time it took you to craft this reply.

God I hate it when people have no social skills and talk like this.

How the f— do you know the circumstances of the person you’re talking to? Maybe they don’t have a computer at hand.

Don’t you realize how snotty and bratty and annoying this sounds, regardless?

Bah.

have fun figuring out which images you’ve saved are actually webp

file * | grep -i webp or something?

Also I just noticed what the arrow in the image pointed to. Holy crap that would be awful if true.

Yes, JPEG XL really is the one that got away. 😭

Hey Google, 🖕🖕 for killing it, man. Very evil and self-centered choice.

On Android, use Share image from Firefox or similar, then click the edit icon before sharing (on the share sheet that pops up), then just immediately share without modifications. It’ll share it as a new PNG I’m pretty sure. Dang Facebook Messenger that won’t accept WebP and I have to do this so many times.

*Muzzle rise

I thought IIFE’s usually looked like (function (...params) {})(...args). That’s not the latest way? To be honest I never used them much, at least not after arrow functions arrived.

lol, you’d really have to go out of your way in this scenario. First implement a way to get every single permutation of a list, then to ahead with the asinine solution. 😆 But yes, nice one! Your imagination is impressive.

So there’s yet another level of quirkery to this bullshit then, it seems. 😆 Nice digging! 🤝

I also noticed that if you surround the curlies with parentheses, you get the same again:

> eval('{} + []')
0
> eval('({}) + []')
'[object Object]'

I guess, yeah, that’ll do it. Although that’d probably be yet one or a few extra factors involving n.

My experiences in Rocket League can confirm. People being toxic in chat? Tell them something in chat back – get the “tg” to confirm French. Every goddamn time, always the French that are so rude.

Why? Why are they having such a bad day every day? Play a game to have fun ffs.

Where I live, every goddamn girl is wearing yoga pants.

And I’m not complaining.

In node, I get the same result in both cases. "[object Object]"

It’s calling the toString() method on both of them, which in the array case is the same as calling .join(",") on the array. For an empty array, that results in an empty string added to "[object Object]" at either end in the respective case in the picture.

Not sure how we’d get 0 though. Anybody know an implementation that does that? Browsers do that maybe? Which way is spec compliant? Number([]) is 0, and I think maybe it’s in the spec that the algorithm for type coercion includes an initial attempt to convert to Number before falling back to toString()? I dunno, this is all off the top of my head.

My mental model of it is a chain, yes. But you can define it however you like. It’s just steps in some direction.

Maybe a cake would suit someone the best.

Exactly. For every level of abstraction, the abstractor is the high level and the abstractee is the lower level. Those aren’t real words perhaps, but you get what I’m saying. It’s all relative along the chain of abstraction.

How in the hell does anyone f— up so bad they get O(n!²)? 🤯 That’s an insanely quickly-growing graph.

Curious what the purpose of that algorithm would have been. 😅