![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d82718c7-5579-4676-8e2e-97b4188f10d3.png)
Hey, it’s me! Spot on. But should be arch.
This is a secondary account that sees the most usage. My first account is listed below. The main will have a list of all the accounts that I use.
Personal website:
Hey, it’s me! Spot on. But should be arch.
Many people use the word without reflecting on how they mean to use it. I’ve seen many a relationship fight indirectly over the ambiguity.
You’re right. I’m glad that they’re trying though.
Depends on the game. I’ve definitely seen requirements list an SSD specifically and the game was designed around that assumption.
Sending this to my neurotic wife. It’s going to bother her now.
I disagree. Lemmy is more resistant to bots because there’s no perverse incentive to boost user activity numbers to please investors and advertisers. Reddit for example doesn’t really care if most comments are fake on a post. It’s still interaction and it pumps numbers. Lemmy is built and run by us. It serves no other masters.
Given that users naturally self-sort into instances, your trolls are also more likely to congregate on instances and communities that can be blocked. I don’t want to name any names but I do block some instances from my view for a reason. The Russian bots congregate in places that are amenable to this, and the design of Lemmy encourages this self-sorting into places where you’re accepted.
The problem is still significant, but there are advantages to the fediverse.
Do you think someone would do that? Just go on the Internet and tell lies?
You make me paranoid.
It’s a close family-friend’s birthday. We’re going to visit a local Oddities Expo event tomorrow, so that should be a fun little adventure.
Truely. Copyright terms are absolutely ridiculous and massively too long for their intended goal.
I’d really like to see an improvement through copyright reform. Copyright periods are already ridiculously too long, but after a game runs its financial course, I think everyone should be free to do with it as they please. At a fundamental level, wasn’t this the intent of a functional copyright system? Is it not the intent to allow the creator to benefit while balancing the value against social good?
Oof. Us and over one hundred of our closest friends.
Paywall.
But by the title, very disappointing to hear.
I have actually done this! Unfortunately I won’t get to enjoy it.
There’s also a couple other conditions that checks and if they match it sends out information that can be used to recover my data for those who need it.
I found a recent article by them that said it was outpacing inflation for a month in the sense that wages were growing in real value, which is an incredibly weak standard.
Practically speaking they should be doubled or more to come close to affordability for many Americans.
The year is 2024. I purchase a nice TV to shun nearly all of its features and never connect it to the internet because it’s designed to be actively malicious.
So the implication is that keeping the masses in check is the primary goal and protecting the children was the incidental part?
It’s a small world. Make tribal monkey brain happy.