If you’re expecting to have a 25 year old physic at 50 you’re in for a lot of depression long before you reach 50.

Meanwhile, Ernie Hudson at 78 years old.

Do you really want to work for a company that allows their HR department to abuse AI as a tool?

To be even more pedantic, isn’t it the impulse?

Unfortunately being aware of the dead cat is part of the dead cat strategy. It’s only alive if you aren’t aware of it.

Like The Game, which you just lost.

This is a dead cat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_cat_strategy

Intergenerational wealth is a major determinant for an individual’s wealth.

Do you want to know more?

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/akillewald/files/generations_of_advantage.pdf

Page 23 is the conclusion, start there.

How do I upload menu details for OSM? I couldn’t figure it out.

Maybe the test says less about the tester, and more about the testee.

This is why I never look up supporting evidence. I rather just stay in my ignorance. /s

Negative claims require evidence.

Otherwise a safety engineer can go to a regulator and say “There are no structural issues with this building.” He is claiming there are no issues, he needs to back that up with evidence.

Your Jedi mind tricks won’t work on me. 😜

I wasn’t arguing for the existence of god.

Let me break this down:

• “There is a god.” --> Burden of proof
• “There is no god.” --> Burden of proof
• “Hey, man. I don’t know.” —> No burden of proof

that’s not how evidence and proof works.

Proof of a negative is common in science and mathematics.

No, you can’t prove that something never happens or that something doesn’t exist.

Edit: For those who are downvoting here are some sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)#Proving_a_negative

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_impossibility

You have made the assertion, thus you have the burden of proof.

“what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence” QED

Careful, many online atheists don’t understand that they have to prove a negative. That they have to prove the assertion: “There is no god.”

The default position is that there is yet insufficient evidence to draw a conclusion.

Edit: Thank you for the downvotes, you have provided me with further evidence that online atheists don’t understand that they have to prove a negative. Your butthurt fuels me.

Translation: “I can’t refute your core argument so I’ll attack the way it was delivered.”

Returning to the idea of rehabilitating these men, I leave you with a quote:

“You catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar.”

I’m going to hold you responsible for defending them from criticism they need to face.

These men already face the criticism, that is the driver pushing them further to become abusive and self-abusive.

What you are suggesting is cornering an animal, and then saying “Hey, we should corner it more because it’s acting aggressively.” and then acting surprised when it attacks you.

We need to offer these men a healthy way out which is culturally appropriate.