• Blizzard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    NixOS forked

    Sounds like it broke and you wanted to f-bomb it in the Good Place.

  • matcha_addict@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not very clear to me that this is any more valuable than OG NixOS.

    This sounds a lot like the forgejo vs gitea fork. I love the forgejo people but I am yet to see a sufficient differentiator.

    • Mx Phibb@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think the reason is because apparently a lot of people are unhappy with a deal Nix inked apparently with a company that does business with the US’ Immigrations and Customs

    • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I like #Nix, I do not like what has happened to it.

      With no explanation of what happened, the conclusion is almost certainly Internal politics.

      It seems like forgejo split from gitea because it looked like gitea was going the route of gitlab. Idk if NixOS is going to commercialize though. Based on recent gossip it sounds like they’re overly adverse to commercialization. IE banning people for having DoD connections. Aux’s talk about special interest groups makes it sound like they’re going embrace that like redhat.

    • moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      https://forgejo.org/compare-to-gitea/

      I dunno, some of these are a pretty big deal, in particular:

      Gitea repeatedly makes choices that leave Gitea admins exposed to known vulnerabilities during extended periods of time. For instance Gitea spent resources to undergo a SOC2 security audit for its SaaS offering while critical vulnerabilities demanded a new release. Advance notice of security releases is for customers only.

      Gitea is developed on github, whereas forgejo is developed on and by codeberg, who use it as their main forge (also mentioned on that page). Someone dogfooding gives me more confidence in the software.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Here’s a tl;dr : https://github.com/KFearsoff/nix-drama-explained

      If you’re looking for a TL;DR of the situation, here it is:

      • Nix community had a governance crisis for years. While there has been progress on building explicit teams to govern the project, it continued to fundamentally rely on implicit authority and soft power
      • Eelco Dolstra, as one of the biggest holders of this implicit authority and soft power, has continuously abused this authority to push his decisions, and to block decisions that he doesn’t like
      • Crucially, he also used his implicit authority to block any progress on solving this governance crisis and establishing systems with explicit authority
      • This has led uncountably many people to burn out over the issue, and culminated in writing an open letter to have Eelco resign from all formal positions in the project and take a 6 month break from any involvement in the community
      • Eelco wrote a response that largely dismisses the issues brought up, and advertises his company’s community as a substitute for Nix community

      And a not too long read : https://dataswamp.org/~solene/2024-04-27-nix-internal-crisis.html

  • meteokr@community.adiquaints.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I would love to host a mirror of the ecosystem once the fork is underway. I made a small attempt a little while ago to create a mirror of the Nix repos but the documentation on how to set it up was lacking. Hosting a Debian mirror is relatively easy, Nix appeared quite a bit more obfuscated.

    • starman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Aux is more similar to Nix, than Guix is.

      Guix uses the same concepts, but still is very different.

      • Shareni@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        What a horrible name. I literally had to search for “aux nix” to find a Reddit post mentioning the URL. Every other search term combination was giving me results for ps aux.

    • meteokr@community.adiquaints.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They are very diverged projects, but share the same philosophy. The Nix packages themselves aren’t the problem, its the organization backing them. So this fork is attempting to create better governance and organization, so that the good underlying tech can keep going and progress.

      For example, Flakes have been held back from truly flourishing because the governing body has purposefully held back changes to those systems for nontechnical problems, but rather political conflicts with their proprietary offerings.

      Think of the fork the same way we had the Alma/Rocky forks off of CentOS. Its political rather than technical, so keeping the same base tech helps adoption. Over time we can improve or replace parts of the ecosystem as the needs of this new project grow.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok, but why? Forking generally means you are unhappy with something but no one is saying what.

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was just thinking about switching to Nix, but I have no idea what to choose now.

    • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nzM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I disagree with @[email protected] (sorry!) - the biggest issue right now is that package maintainers are leaving in droves - at least 15 contributors left a few days ago, a number which has likely increased these past few days - and will continue to increase. I think the only people left will be the ones who support Eelco and the toxic culture brewed by him.

      What this means is that you risk your packages getting out of date, including slow delivery of security updates (which was already an increasing concern, due to the way the Nixpkgs build system worked). Worst case scenario, some (many?) packages may never even get an update.

      So now’s definitely NOT a good time to switch, and in fact I’d also urge existing users to look at other distros, at least temporarily until this whole thing settles down.

      • Shareni@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I disagree with @[email protected] (sorry!)

        Don’t say sorry for making an actual argument, or are you some Canadian lol?

        at least 15 contributors left a few days ago

        According to this list there are 3470 maintainers. Were those 15 doing so much work to warrant calling it the end of days?

        What this means is that you risk your packages getting out of date, including slow delivery of security updates

        A possible delay for some package updates vs certainly outdated packages in my native Debian. Not really a choice IMO