• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    rich bastards claiming that windmills would harm them through visual pollution.

    you fucking fuckwits, smog is visual pollution. But they don’t care.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      you fucking fuckwits, smog is visual pollution.

      I’m old enough to remember people losing their shit at China over the 2008 Beijing Olympics drowning in a toxic cloud. The international outcry was such that the state spent a decade cleaning all that shit up (which produced its own wave of “Has Chinese Eco-fascism Gone Woke?!” screamer articles in turn).

      But their rate of pollution has been falling steadily for the last two decades, in no small part because the state wasn’t fighting an uphill battle against corporate slobs in white doctor’s coats trying to tell everyone that smog wasn’t happening/was good aktuly.

      Meanwhile, US expenditures on lobbying, denialism, and greenwashing stretch into the billions of dollars annually. And its not hard to understand why, when the ROI is $7T/year on the international stage.

    • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Windmills are a whole lot better than burning coal, but aren’t perfect. Recyling the blades after their 20 year lifespan is a nightmare.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I doubt it’s any worse than the other mountains of waste we produce. I’d wager it’d barely even register.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        nothing is perfect. we need imperfect things that don’t emit co2. windmills have many detractors but at the moment represent mostly co2-free power if we’re willing to take it. and recycling industries for solar and wind are coming, they’ll never be perfect either, but when the waste stream becomes lucrative enough they’ll find a way.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          but when the waste stream becomes lucrative enough they’ll find a way.

          The problem with capitalism in a nutshell.

          • SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Because mercantilist wind turbine blades recycle themselves? Or did you mean to imply that communist wind turbines recycle themselves?

            • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I mean to say that when financial incentive is the only incentive then a lot of things that would make this a better world end up on the scrap heap.