• Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      More like lots of having to refute dumb arguments that imply choosing harm reduction is the same thing as endorsing harm.

      • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        “harm reduction” in the context of genocide is absolutely wild. It’s a genocide, not a heroin habit

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I want no genocide. My choices are: vote for a candidate that would make the genocide worse, while complaining they’re supporting a genocide, or vote for a candidate that would more or less do nothing about it, while complaining they’re ineffectual at stopping the genocide.

          How can you not see one of those two options is better?

          • Zeroxxx@lemmy.id
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That genocide supporter oughta Genocide Biden and the other do nothing one oughta Peaceful Trump I see.