• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 1st, 2023

help-circle

  • because of their deep and abiding fear of the Evil Russian Backed KDP party (god damn, everything old really is new again)

    You missed the moment where NSDAP and German communists kinda had intersecting constituencies, as in “angry young people with nothing good to do”.

    Many stormtroopers were members of both at different points of their, eh, path.

    And then, what really kicked off martial law was the Reichstagg fire,

    Which was almost certainly a false flag operation by Nazis.

    Liberals, Conservatives, and Fascists all united under a single banner in their staunch hatred of German Communism.

    Such parallels always suck. They didn’t really have liberals in the Weimar republic. It was all conservatives, monarchists, nationalists, and some fishy social-democrats. And it was kinda authoritarian at every point.

    This was decades after German military police and Freikorps paramilitary groups under Hindenburg crushed the Spartacus League during the 1919 strike wave. The leaders of the movement - Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Liebknecht, and Franz Mehring - were executed by the police and the organizations disbanded under threat of further imprisonment/execution.

    Yep. You might consider that such a republic shouldn’t be so readily compared to the US.

    I’m not saying future is cool.


  • These fit under “state-level scams”.

    EDIT: Still, while I wasn’t going to compliment them or something, it can be a valid strategy for survival to use anything to accumulate some operational power ; I can see a few nations (not all of them have recognized states) on the map for which it may be necessary to survive in the following decade. But Nazis didn’t have to take such risks, it was ideological for them that theft and robbery are better than honest work.


  • They’ve also ran a few state-level scams and Ponzi schemes to have the funds for that military and other spending.

    Their business model was - step 1, cheat to have money, step 2, use money to rearm, step 3, conquer and loot, thus get funds that way, step 4 probably would be to force some peace, then rearm, then rinse and repeat, but they didn’t manage to capture a few strategic areas they needed in time. So they had fuel shortages, food shortages, and ultimately lost.



  • rottingleaf@lemmy.ziptoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldCasual reminder
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    What do you expect, people think Hitler was good for most Germans and restored economy and made trains run on time, and the defeat part oh well. Because that’s what movies show. And that’s because for commies Hitler was just a variation of the west, probably less capricious, while for the west Hitler was bad, but good against commies. So both would show Nazis as being better than their opponent.







  • Yes, only it’s generally unpleasant to say condescending stuff of the “I’ve got you figured out and I see this thing deeper than you” kind to someone who’s very well familiar with the thing in question when you are not.

    And in personal experience

    to try and show an interest in something you like

    people ask questions.


  • rottingleaf@lemmy.ziptoStar Wars Memes@lemmy.worldI'm getting old
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 days ago

    Why does every idiot who is not a Star Wars fan think that repeating the normie stereotype about it is very smart? Which is this pic BTW.

    Star Wars since the OT and till around 2006 had very clear borders between, 1, that which doesn’t get mentioned, but follows from what’s shown, 2, that which doesn’t get explained, 3, that which is explained by magic, 4, that which has decent, but very roughly cut sci-fi descriptions and, finally, 5, that which is taken seriously.

    Disney doesn’t understand how to use any of these categories, especially that core plot points can only belong to #5, that #1 is not just fan imagination, but part of the paradigm, that #2 is not a box for everything lazy, that #3 cannot be center of the plot, and that #4 is still necessary.


  • It’s a society (or the whole humanity) becoming big enough to survive even when ignorant murderers are the elite and the majority of it, and civilized people - a smaller part and almost a property, similar to animals in a zoo.

    When such a point is reached, the former will make the transition, and the latter will diminish over time. Then it just has no future.

    A bit like with Ottoman empire and Qajar Iran, only on the scale of the whole humanity there won’t be someone else to buy weapons and technologies from to keep going. Then some of the previously passable filters will kick in. Like hunger or resource scarcity.